facebook

Chris Selley: Listening to senators debate marijuana bill convinced me we need to abolish the Senate

Here’s something I bet you didn’t know: Bill C-45, the Liberals’ marijuana legalization legislation, allows children between 12 and 17 to possess up to five grams of cannabis. It sounds crazy, right? The whole stated goal of the project was to keep marijuana out of children’s hands! Yet no lesser authorities than Conservative senators Thanh Hai Ngo and Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu, along with their leader in the upper chamber, Senator Larry Smith, and Justin Trudeau-appointed “independent” Senator Marie-Françoise Mégie — a physician and former professor — insisted in a debate Thursday that it is so.

If a minor consumed all five grams in a given day, Ngo (correctly) opined, that could mess him up good and proper.

“Imagine looking out across a classroom of 12-to-13-year-old children, all permitted to have five grams of pot on their desks,” Smith demanded.

No, seriously, do it. Do it for Canada’s children.

In an otherwise blithering address to the Red Chamber, Senator David Wells at least gave away what on earth his colleagues were talking about: “youth ages 12 to 17 will be able to possess up to five grams of dried cannabis before facing criminal charges,” he said. He contended this was “hidden away” in the bill — “hidden away in Division 1, Section 8(1)(c)” — and he called it “shocking.”

Trudeau-appointed “independent” Senator Frances Larkin suggested to Wells that it wasn’t “hidden” at all, inasmuch as he cited its location, and asked whether he would prefer children aged 12 to 17 be subject to criminal sanctions for small-scale possession.

“I did find it hidden there,” Wells protested. “There are lots of things hidden in there” — in the bill, he means, which is on the internet and everything.

Wells denied wanting to send 12-to-17-year-olds into the criminal system, but he also argued the bill as written “give(s) tacit approval” to the practice. By not making it criminal. Which he wouldn’t support.

Furthermore, Wells demanded to know, “Why doesn’t it say from age 1 to 17?”

So, yeah, that’s all bananas. The provinces are free to punish young people under the legal age for possession of any quantity of cannabis, to seize said cannabis and to fine the young people for having possessed it. And there is every reason to assume they will do just that, just as they do for alcohol. (“Imagine looking out across a classroom of 12 to 13-year-old children, all permitted to have a 26-er of Canadian Club on their desks.”)

But this was the quality of debate I heard, slack-jawed, down the wire from Ottawa on Thursday afternoon.

On innumerable fronts, senators weighed in as if the government were inventing marijuana rather than legalizing it.

“Condominium and apartment dwellers are grappling with the prospect of their homes being infiltrated by the odour of second-hand cannabis smoke,” Senator Judith Seidman fretted. (Welcome to my condominium building.) Senator Yonah Martin wondered if Canadian servicemen would be allowed to show up for duty high. (Can they show up drunk?) Martin wondered if teachers would have to tolerate high students if they were of legal age to consume it. (Obviously not.)

The timeline “means that our young generations will not be taught about the implications and dangers of consuming marijuana … prior to its legalization,” Smith worried, insanely. (It’s called health class.)

This is the Senate at its finest

Boisvenu managed to land upon a legitimate complaint: that C-45 makes possession of more than five grams of marijuana a criminal offence for people under the legal age, but perfectly legal for adults.

“Do we really want young people ending up in the criminal justice system?” he asked. Except … this is the same guy who’s protesting kids being “allowed” to possess up to five grams of cannabis!

Senator Nancy Greene Raine wondered if legal marijuana might impact Canadian universities’ ability to recruit international students.

No word of a lie, she meant negatively.

“What will (parents) say when their 12-year-old suggests growing cannabis?” asked Mégie. “It will be legal, after all.” (They would say no.) “How will parents ever notice that one or two marijuana buds are missing from one of their … plants?” she asked. (How do they notice it now?)

Sen. Raynell Andreychuk didn’t just trot out the silly idea that Canada’s signature on various international anti-drug treaties could make legalization untenable. She said it could threaten nothing less than “the international order.”

“This is the Senate at its finest,” declared Andreychuk.

And that might be the moment I finally tipped over into being a full-blown abolitionist. This was a horror show. Any randomly selected group of half-literate, half-sober Canadians would have provided better insight than these (mostly Conservative) senators — including on the legitimate issues they identified, not least the implausibility of the stated goal of eliminating the black market, before burying them under a mountain of nonsense.

At least senators passed the damn bill in the end. It will now go to committee. But no body capable of producing such idiocy has any business meddling with any legislation passed by democratically elected politicians, no matter how stupid they might be themselves.

• Email: [email protected] | Twitter:



Source link

>
Buds2Go.ca is not responsible for, nor do we always share the opinions of the content posted on our website through our partners or independent authors.

Leave a Reply


What is a Sativa?

Sativa strains of medicinal marijuana are usually uplifting and stimulating. If you’ve ever smoked or ingested cannabis that makes everything funny and puts you in a great mood, it was probably from a Sativa strain. It creates a feeling of comfort, non-drowsy, and usually introspective highs. The effects of smoking or ingesting a Sativa makes them particularly popular among artists and creatives. The most popular medicinal benefits range from treating mental and behavioral problems, to treating depression, stress and ADHD.

What is an Indica?

The major difference between Sativa’s and Indica’s is while a Sativa can make you feel alert, active, and aware, an Indica will have a relaxing feel on the body. The physical effects of an Indica strain commonly include a drowsy and mellow mood with stress and pain relief. Indica’s are one of the more suggested strains when using it for medicinal purposes as it effectively treats sleeping disorders such as insomnia, fibromyalgia, body aches and pains. Indica’s are also commonly used for treating Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Fibromyalgia and Lupus

Why Choose Hybrid?

The benefits to smoking or ingesting a Hybrid strain are simply as follows. Hybrid’s offer the best of both worlds combining several qualities of each containing strain. Some Hybrid’s are Indica dominant, which will offer pain relief and / or mellow mood, however may contain up to 50% Sativa so it will not make you too drowsy. Other’s may offer a Sativa dominant strain, which will encompass several calming benefits and pain relief, but also give a mellow, yet energetic high.

Why use Buds2Go?

We offer a guaranteed, reliable medicinal marijuana buying and shipping experience for our members. There are still thousands of people who don’t live in areas that are served by local dispensaries such as Vancouver and Victoria BC. We offer a Canada-Wide shipping service that is both fast and discreet and always include tracking numbers. We verify our members age using a photo ID verification system that usually takes less than 2 hours to complete, after which that data is destroyed and our new member is assigned a Verified membership number.